If you work in a bureaucratic or enterprise organisation, the inevitable result of 2020’s bout of intellectual masturbation on the topic of Black Lives Mattering is going to be more "training" based on the apparent need to increase diversity in your organisation at all costs. One is reminded of the remarks of the great American satirist Tom Lehrer in the intro to his song "It Makes a Fellow Proud to be a Soldier”:
“...one of the many fine things one has to admit is the way that the Army has carried the American democratic ideal to its logical conclusion, in the sense that not only do they prohibit discrimination on the grounds of race, creed and color, but also on the grounds of ability.”
How then can we unenlightened peons “ride the wave” of diversity training so as to achieve the maximum benefit? Allow your humble correspondent to guide you.
Assuming that you're taking an in-person or video-driven interactive training session, the first thing to understand are your own objectives:
- Are you hoping to benefit from what’s being taught;
- Are you looking for the minimum interaction and distraction for your life; or
- do you resent the intrusion on your life and intend to resist actively?
All are valid choices, but make sure you pick one and plan for it. Are you aiming to avoid risk of being disciplined/fired? That's also an important factor to be aware of. If you're 63 and planning to retire soon, you might well not care at all, and in fact being fired could be a
trigger for a lucrative constructive dismissal suit. If you've just accepted a job at another company which is not full of woke scolds, you can
probably go to town. If you're 22 and just starting your career, your risk appetite is likely very small. Know before you go.
You also need to understand your “facilitator” (session leader), what they’re trying to achieve, and how they’re intending to do it. Unless they’ve just come down with the last shower, they will be mentally grouping their audience as above, and labelling each of you "learner", "holidaymaker" or "prisoner" - who
says that stereotyping doesn't serve a purpose? Generally they try to focus on the first group and minimize contact with the others, but you might come across someone who is on an evangelical mission to convert everyone - in that case, holidaymakers and prisoners are no longer safe.
Course pre-reading and objectives
A tactic I've recently seen is to distribute “pre-reading” around the group. To make sure it gets done, they may also require everyone to prepare a small amount of pre-work based on the reading. This might be a form you have to submit before the course, or to assemble some written notes on your response to it, or to prepare a scenario for discussion in the group. (e.g. to answer: “what is a time that you felt uncomfortable in a racially charged situation? How did you respond? How did you think the other parties felt?”)
If your corporate training department is doing its job - and it’s quite possible that they aren't - the course description should come with some stated learning objectives. This will tell you a lot about what the course is trying to get you to do, and it will also clue you in to what evidence they might expect the course to produce. After all, the instructor can’t blithely claim "everyone is racism free now, that will be $5000 please!", or at least they shouldn't be able to. Therefore your
company will be expecting objectives that are at least somewhat measurable, and expect to measure them.
The objectives will therefore tell you what the instructor wants you to be thinking or to have achieved by the end
of the class, giving you a clear signpost to the topics under discussion. This can be a useful prompt to do pre-reading
around the topics. For instance, if it requires "understanding the causes and result of implicit bias" then understanding the original study and the
various debunkings can prepare you well for raising pointed questions.
Conducting yourself in session
If you intend to be a holiday maker, the worst thing to do is to make this apparent in the first ten minutes of class. Turn up a bit early, be chatty with the facilitator and others, take active part in the
icebreaker activity (there's almost always an icebreaker). That should buy you some initial credit with the
instructor, even though you disengage for the rest of the session. I'd also recommend doing
the same burst of activity when you come back from each break. That way the instructor starts to get the
impression that he or she is boring you, despite your best efforts to be attentive. Or possibly that you're snorting cocaine
in the bathroom in the breaks, which I cannot endorse.
If you're a "prisoner" looking to tunnel out, I'd actually recommend a similar approach. At the very
least, you don't want to look hostile in the first ten minutes. (And you shouldn't be hostile then
anyway, because even the most painfully right-on diversity trainer deserves a chance to show that they're
trying to make this session useful and interesting.) However, it's fine to develop a more quizzical
look and increasingly more defensive body language over time. Evolve from an occasional raised eyebrow
to stroking/holding your chin (showing disagreement with what the facilitator is saying), to crossed arms,
to switching between crossed arms and crossed legs, depending on how obvious you want disagreement to be.
This raises an implicit challenge to the facilitator, and whether they take you up on it can indicate
their level of confidence in their content.
These events are normally "laptops down, phones down" so that everyone is "present". However
taking a notebook and pen won't raise any eyebrows, and these can be useful tools. Whenever
the facilitator says something weird or objectionable, you can take a direct note. This can
be great material for feedback (see later). At worst, you can draft a love letter to your
garage mechanic - no-one's going to ask to see your notes, and if they do then you can
indignantly refuse. Make sure it's your own pen and own notebook.
Video sessions come with their own opportunities and challenges.
For holidaymakers, feigning attention on video is a whole topic in itself, but you want to watch out for
the facilitator calling on you for a response when you have no idea what they just said. Normally they require
everyone to have video on and be on mute by default, which buys you a few seconds to "fumble"
for un-mute. I recommend using an external, wired mike (e.g. on headphones), and so if you're stuck
then gently move the plug out and in while you're talking to fake a dodgy connection. Practice makes perfect! Remember to temporarily stop using that mike and move to just using the laptop mike - it's
then fine to "reset" your machine at the next break and report things "working" again.
I also recommend setting up poor lighting conditions in your room; either a strong light source causing
glare (sun through a window), or curtains drawn to "remove the glare" but leaving a dark, grainy picture. Touching an unwashed thumb on the camera lens can help too - be sure to clean it after the session! For
dark rooms, remember that glasses can reflect the colours of your screen so check before the meeting to
see if they give anything away.
Group and pair exercises
Ideally, have a good friend in the same session who has similar views on these mandatory training
events, and pair off with them for exercises if you get the chance. However, experienced facilitators
will make people rotate round groups, so you've got to plan on group exercises with one or more
"committed" learners. In my experience the best way to handle this is to realise that people love
to talk about themselves - and the self-righteous adore it. So lead them into talking about
their experiences, ask "concerned" and "interested" open questions such as "how did that change
how you thought about...", and let them run out the clock for you.
You're going to need to have one or two experiences to talk about, if you don't have an
obvious topic then I recommend something like:
- the time you were the only white person / male / non-tranvestite in a place and had
an epiphany "this must be what it's like to be black / female / a cross dresser all the time!"; or
- childhood experience being once-off mean to someone black / female / cross-dressing which you
only ten years later realising how that affected their relationships in school and oppressed them; or
- if you're got military experience, something on perception of veterans - veteran
status is protected in the USA, and companies often have diversity outreach efforts focused on
veteran hiring not least because they work hard and are good at execution and leadership but
strangely diversity courses seldom talk much about this.
Stirring the pot
If you've got a best friend / partner / family member in a "protected" category, and frowns
on "diversity" training, don't be afraid to cite them. "My mate is black and he says
it's daft to focus on deaths caused by police as long as we're all shooting each other all the time" -
as long as he'll back you up on that, you can probably get away with it. It will derail the
hell out of the conversation, so make sure you're comfortable with raised emotions if you're going
to try this.
The Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI)
label is itself ripe for manipulation. You could refer to it as Diversity, Inclusion and Equity (DIE); or perhaps Inclusion, Equity and Diversion (IED), making sure to use the appropriate abbreviation. Every
firm should have a constructive IED program, after all!
Agreeing with "Black Lives Matter" and raising the game by suggesting "Unborn black lives matter too!" addressing the 35% abortion percentage in the black community is probably only viable if you don't mind a meeting-without-coffee
with your boss and HR afterwards. Mind you, if you're a well-established Christian (or Muslim!) you might
be able to get away with it.
If they do mention deaths-at-the-hand-of-police, you can refer to
my previous analysis of the 2015 black unarmed fatalities in the USA. Short version: if you're
not armed, and don't actively try to attack a police officer, you're actually remarkably safe even
if you're black.
Raising the well-documented differences between genders is only for the suicidally
determined. The facts might be with you, but you can expect prompt personal attacks on
you during and after the course.
Constructive feedback
There is almost inevitably a post-course survey. The temptation is to blow this off with the minimum of effort, but
If you actually want to effect changes then this is one of the best bang-for-your-buck places to make effort.
In terms of scoring, try not to be too much of an outlier. Score the content and the facilitator
honestly and separately if you can. You can have the world's best facilitator, but if they're stuck
with bad or dishonest material then there's only so much they can do. Highlight how the course has
failed to help you meet the objectives or failed to be convinced about the assertions.
Where possible, make recommendations for "improving" the exercises. Say that there needs
to be more time / quicker switching around / better briefing / more guidance on picking the right
focus topic / content that you can better relate to. Again, you want to show helpfulness so they
don't dismiss your scores and feedback as "grumpy prisoner".
If the facilitator or someone in the class has said something actually offensive, don't hold
back from flagging it - I'd suggest without naming the person, at least initially. Make sure
you wrote it down verbatim at the time in your notes, with the point in the session marked, so you can point
to your notes as evidence.
Next steps
With luck, that will be it for the next year or so. No matter how woke the company, diversity
training is expensive in terms of lost productivity, so they're unlike to repeat it unless they
feel they have to. Sit back and enjoy 364 days of just treating people like people without fear
or favour no matter what their skin colour, gender, age, or religion.
